Home/D.C. Circuit/S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Gold Seal Company

S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Gold Seal Company

230 F.2d 832, 97 U.S. App. D.C. 282, 100 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 400, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3327
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMarch 8, 1956
Docket12764
StatusPublished
Cited by29 cases

This text of 230 F.2d 832 (S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Gold Seal Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Gold Seal Company, 230 F.2d 832, 97 U.S. App. D.C. 282, 100 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 400, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3327 (D.C. Cir. 1956).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gold Seal Company sued in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, seeking a decree authorizing the Commissioner of Patents to register as a trade-mark the words Glass Wax used by it as a name for a liquid cleaner of glass and metal. S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc., answered, seeking a declaratory judgment that the words Glass Wax do not constitute a lawful trade-mark, and counter-claiming for in-junctive relief, profits and damages on the ground that the mark constitutes a false representation and description of goods, thereby causing Johnson damage or the likelihood of damage. Gold Seal’s complaint was dismissed, as was Johnson’s counter-claim, and the latter appeals.

For the reasons given in District Judge Youngdahl’s opinion, Gold Seal Company v. Weeks, D.C.D.C.1955, 129 F. Supp. 928, at pages 937-940, the dismissal of the counter-claim is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alpo Petfoods, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Company
913 F.2d 958 (D.C. Circuit, 1990)
Alpo Petfoods, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co.
720 F. Supp. 194 (District of Columbia, 1989)
American Rockwool, Inc. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
640 F. Supp. 1411 (E.D. North Carolina, 1986)
Thorn, Philip A. v. Reliance Van Company, Inc., Welsh, Thomas, Weatherley, Charles A., Bailey, Emma M., and O'neal, N.A. Michael, Jr
736 F.2d 929 (Third Circuit, 1984)
PepsiCo, Inc. v. Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corp.
578 F. Supp. 196 (S.D. New York, 1984)
U-Haul International, Inc. v. Jartran, Inc.
681 F.2d 1159 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
U-Haul International, Inc., an Oregon Corporation v. Jartran, Inc., a Florida Corporation and Sandra C. Tinsley, Inc., James A. Ryder, an Individual, Jartran, Inc., Counterclaimant v. U-Haul International, Inc., Counterdefendant
681 F.2d 1159 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
Pennwalt Corp. v. Plough, Inc.
85 F.R.D. 257 (D. Delaware, 1979)
DCA Food Industries Inc. v. Hawthorn Mellody, Inc.
470 F. Supp. 574 (S.D. New York, 1979)
Alberto-Culver Co. v. Gillette Co.
408 F. Supp. 1160 (N.D. Illinois, 1976)
Sarah Coventry, Inc. v. T. Sardelli & Sons, Inc.
526 F.2d 20 (First Circuit, 1975)
Skil Corporation v. Rockwell International Corp.
375 F. Supp. 777 (N.D. Illinois, 1974)
Ames Publishing Co. v. Walker-Davis Publications, Inc.
372 F. Supp. 1 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1974)
Fur Information & Fashion Council, Inc. v. E. F. Timme & Son, Inc.
364 F. Supp. 16 (S.D. New York, 1973)
Arnesen v. Raymond Lee Organization, Inc.
333 F. Supp. 116 (C.D. California, 1971)
Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd.
442 F.2d 686 (Second Circuit, 1971)
Jo Ann Colligan v. Activities Club Of New York, Ltd.
442 F.2d 686 (Second Circuit, 1971)
Glenn v. Advertising Publications, Inc.
251 F. Supp. 889 (S.D. New York, 1966)
Smith-Victor Corporation v. Sylvania Electric Products, Inc.
242 F. Supp. 302 (N.D. Illinois, 1965)
Wilson Jones Company v. The Gilbert & Bennett Manufacturing Company
332 F.2d 216 (Second Circuit, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 F.2d 832, 97 U.S. App. D.C. 282, 100 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 400, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/s-c-johnson-son-inc-v-gold-seal-company-cadc-1956.