Rzezniczak v. Vantine

26 A.D.2d 792, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3474

Opinion

Motion for a stay denied, without costs and without prejudice to its renewal upon sufficient papers (see Matter of Rosenbaum v. Wolff, 270 App. Div. 843). Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rzezniczak v. Vantine, 26 A.D.2d 792, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3474 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

26 A.D.2d 792 (Rzezniczak v. Vantine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rosenbaum v. Wolff
270 A.D. 843 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)