Rosenbaum v. Wolff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rosenbaum v. Wolff

270 A.D. 843, 60 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4254

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 11, 1946

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 270 A.D. 843 (Rosenbaum v. Wolff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rosenbaum v. Wolff, 270 A.D. 843, 60 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4254 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for permission to appeal to the Appellate Division from an order of the County Court of Rockland County denying, upon conditions, a motion to dismiss an appeal from the Justice’s Court, Town of Ramapo, and for a stay denied, without costs. The statutory provisions relating to such appeals neither require nor authorize such permission. (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 622, 623.) The motion for a stay pending such appeal is denied for lack of a meritorious showing. (Justice Ct. Act, § 433; L. 1920, ch. 937; Black V. Maitland, 1 App. Div. 6; Harrison Bros. Go., Inc., v. Excelsior Bag & Mfg. Go., 180 App. Div. 790.) Present — Lewis, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Aldrich and Nolan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for permission to appeal to the Appellate Division from an order of the County Court of Rockland County denying, upon conditions, a motion to dismiss an appeal from the Justice’s Court, Town of Ramapo, and for a stay denied, without costs. The statutory provisions relating to such appeals neither require nor authorize such permission. (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 622, 623.) The motion for a stay pending such appeal is denied for lack of a meritorious showing. (Justice Ct. Act, § 433; L. 1920, ch. 937; Black V. Maitland, 1 App. Div. 6; Harrison Bros. Go., Inc., v. Excelsior Bag & Mfg. Go., 180 App. Div. 790.) Present — Lewis, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Aldrich and Nolan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

270 A.D. 843, 60 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosenbaum-v-wolff-nyappdiv-1946.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack