Rzepecki v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board
This text of 429 A.2d 1388 (Rzepecki v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Petitioner challenges respondent’s decision denying her request for disability retirement under D.C.Code 1973, §§ 4-526, -527. Finding substantial evidence in the record to support respondent’s determination, and no error of law having been committed, we affirm.
The Board found that petitioner, who presented evidence of a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, suffered “some limiting disability,” but concluded that she was not permanently disabled for useful and efficient service in the grade or class of position last occupied by her as a member of the United States Park Police.
Affirmed.
Petitioner previously had sustained an ankle injury and originally sought disability retirement on that basis, which was denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
429 A.2d 1388, 1981 D.C. App. LEXIS 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rzepecki-v-police-firemens-retirement-relief-board-dc-1981.