Rytlewski v. Government of The United States

S.D. New York

Rytlewski v. Government of The United States

DecidedOctober 22, 2020

Docket1:20-cv-08543

StatusUnknown

This text of Rytlewski v. Government of The United States (Rytlewski v. Government of The United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rytlewski v. Government of The United States, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ROBERT ALLEN RYTLEWSKI, Plaintiff, 20-CV-8543 (CM) -against- ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEES OR IFP APPLICATION GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff brings this action pro se. To proceed with a civil action in this Court, a plaintiff must either pay $400.00 in fees – a $350.00 filing fee plus a $50.00 administrative fee – or, to request permission to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), that is, without prepayment of fees, submit a signed IFP application. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. Plaintiff submitted this action without the filing fees or an IFP application. Within thirty days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must either pay the $400.00 in fees or submit the attached IFP application. If Plaintiff submits the IFP application, it should be labeled with docket number 20-CV-8543 (CM). If the Court grants the IFP application, Plaintiff will be permitted to proceed without prepayment of fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The Clerk of Court is directed to transmit a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket.1 No summons shall issue at this time. If Plaintiff complies with this order, the case shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk’s Office. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed.

1 Plaintiff consents to receive electronic service of notices and documents in this case. (ECF No. 3.) The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: October 22, 2020 , New York, New York hie. Iu Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ROBERT ALLEN RYTLEWSKI, Plaintiff, 20-CV-8543 (CM) -against- ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEES OR IFP APPLICATION GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff brings this action pro se. To proceed with a civil action in this Court, a plaintiff must either pay $400.00 in fees – a $350.00 filing fee plus a $50.00 administrative fee – or, to request permission to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), that is, without prepayment of fees, submit a signed IFP application. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. Plaintiff submitted this action without the filing fees or an IFP application. Within thirty days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must either pay the $400.00 in fees or submit the attached IFP application. If Plaintiff submits the IFP application, it should be labeled with docket number 20-CV-8543 (CM). If the Court grants the IFP application, Plaintiff will be permitted to proceed without prepayment of fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The Clerk of Court is directed to transmit a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket.1 No summons shall issue at this time. If Plaintiff complies with this order, the case shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk’s Office. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed.

1 Plaintiff consents to receive electronic service of notices and documents in this case. (ECF No. 3.) The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: October 22, 2020 , New York, New York hie. Iu Chief United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Rytlewski v. Government of The United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rytlewski-v-government-of-the-united-states-nysd-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack