Home/New York Court of Appeals/Ryan v. State

Ryan v. State

435 N.E.2d 396, 56 N.Y.2d 561, 450 N.Y.S.2d 179, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3236
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 25, 1982·No. Claim 59804·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

According to claimant’s theory of liability as stated in his verified bill of particulars, the acts of prosecutorial misconduct complained of were undertaken by the various employees of the State for the purpose of advancing their own personal interests. That being so, the doctrine of prosecutorial immunity and the legal principle that vicarious liability cannot be imposed upon the State as employer under the doctrine of respondeat superior in such circumstances preclude recovery against the State. (Imbler v Pachtman, 424 US 409; Sauter v New York Tribune, 305 NY 442, 444-445; accord Restatement, Agency 2d, § 235; see, also, Cornell v State of New York, 46 NY2d 1032; Johnson v Daily News, 34 NY2d 33; see, generally, Prosser, Law of Torts [4th ed], § 70, pp 464-466; 2 Harper and James, Law of Torts, § 26.9, pp 1391-1392.) Therefore, claimant’s action properly was dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ryan v. State, 435 N.E.2d 396, 56 N.Y.2d 561, 450 N.Y.S.2d 179, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3236 (N.Y. 1982).

435 N.E.2d 396 (Ryan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knapper v. Connick
681 So. 2d 944 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1996)
Rosen & Bardunias v. County of Westchester
158 A.D.2d 679 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Glenn v. State
144 Misc. 2d 101 (New York State Court of Claims, 1989)
Annonio v. Balzano
139 A.D.2d 943 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Brown v. State
125 A.D.2d 750 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Ryan v. State
435 N.E.2d 396 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)