Ryan Patterson v. Centurion
This text of Ryan Patterson v. Centurion (Ryan Patterson v. Centurion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 25-3104 ___________________________
Ryan Terrell Patterson
Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Centurion; Philip Tippen, MD Regional Director; T. Taylor, RN BSN; Amy Courtney, D.O.N.; James Donald, Dr.; Unknown Espinza, HSA; Unknown Humble; Unknown Cassidy, Nurse; Unknown April, Nurse; Debra Bacon, NP; Dr. Chada Ashokkumar; Unknown Sheldon
Defendants - Appellees ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________
Submitted: March 19, 2026 Filed: March 31, 2026 [Unpublished] ____________
Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Missouri inmate Ryan Patterson appeals from the district court’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) dismissal of his action without prejudice. The dismissal was based on his failure to comply with an order to pay an initial partial filing fee. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court grants Patterson’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), vacates the dismissal order, and remands for further proceedings.
Upon careful review, this court concludes that the dismissal of Patterson’s action was an abuse of discretion because—based on his certified inmate account statements—it appears that his failure to make an initial partial payment on time was due to a lack of available funds. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) (stating that court shall collect initial partial filing fee “when funds exist”), (b)(4) (providing that prisoner shall not be prohibited from bringing civil action because he lacks assets and means to pay initial partial filing fee); Boyle v. Am. Auto Serv., Inc., 571 F.3d 734, 742 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 850 (9th Cir. 2002) (for prisoners whose prior account balances resulted in assessment of initial fee, but who do not have funds available when payment is ordered, § 1915(b)(4) should protect them from having their cases dismissed for non-payment); cf. Henderson v. Norris, 129 F.3d 481, 483–84 (8th Cir. 1997) (per curiam) (§ 1915(b)(4) permits prisoner to appeal if he has no assets and no means to pay initial partial appellate filing fee; in such cases, appellate filing fees are to be collected and paid by installment method contained in § 1915(b)(2)).
The dismissal order is vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Patterson’s motion to proceed IFP is granted. See Henderson, 129 F.3d at 484–85. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ryan Patterson v. Centurion, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryan-patterson-v-centurion-ca8-2026.