Ryan Drug Co. v. Hvambsahl

65 N.W. 873, 92 Wis. 62, 1896 Wisc. LEXIS 242
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided January 7, 1896·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Winslow, J.

No interest should have been allowed except from the time of the commencement of the action. There had been no demand for payment, and the statements of account sent by the plaintiff at regular intervals, and kept by the defendant, in which no interest was ever claimed, constituted accounts stated, binding on both parties, in the absence of fraud and mistake. Cobb v. Arundell, 26 Wis. 553; Chandler v. People's S. Bank, 61 Cal. 401.

By the Gourt.— Judgment reversed, and action remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ryan Drug Co. v. Hvambsahl, 65 N.W. 873, 92 Wis. 62, 1896 Wisc. LEXIS 242 (Wis. 1896).

65 N.W. 873 (Ryan Drug Co. v. Hvambsahl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heinemann Bros. v. Wendt
209 N.W. 699 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1926)
Peters v. National Surety Co.
166 N.W. 43 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1918)
State v. City of Milwaukee
149 N.W. 579 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1914)
Bassick Gold Mine Co. v. Beardsley
49 Colo. 275 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1910)
Ripley v. Sage Land & Improvement Co.
119 N.W. 108 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1909)
Laycock v. Parker
79 N.W. 327 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1899)