Ryals v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Ryals v. State

110 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 692

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 14, 1926

Docket4 Div. 198.

StatusPublished

This text of 110 So. 925 (Ryals v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ryals v. State, 110 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 692 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The court has read the evidence in this case en banc, and we are of the opinion that the saíne fails to identify the car found in the possession of the defendants as the car alleged to have been stolen. It follows that the general affirmative charge, requested by appellants, should have been given, and for the error in its refusal the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The court has read the evidence in this case en banc, and we are of the opinion that the saíne fails to identify the car found in the possession of the defendants as the car alleged to have been stolen. It follows that the general affirmative charge, requested by appellants, should have been given, and for the error in its refusal the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ryals-v-state-alactapp-1926.