Ryals v. State

119 So. 925, 23 Ala. App. 672
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 22, 1929·No. 3 Div. 557.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted on a charge of manufacturing whisky. A careful reading of this record does not disclose a single exception presenting a question of merit. The defendant has had a fair trial. The question of guilt vel non was properly presented to the jury, and, there being no error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ryals v. State, 119 So. 925, 23 Ala. App. 672 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

119 So. 925 (Ryals v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.