Rutland v. State
141 So. 925, 25 Ala. App. 674
This text of 141 So. 925 (Rutland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rutland v. State, 141 So. 925, 25 Ala. App. 674 (Ala. Ct. App. 1932).
Opinion
This appellant was tried by the court without a jury. She was charged by indictment with violating the prohibition law. The judgment of conviction rendered by the court was proper and fully warranted under the evidence. No error appears.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
141 So. 925, 25 Ala. App. 674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rutland-v-state-alactapp-1932.