Rutland v. State
134 So. 457, 24 Ala. App. 276, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 276
This text of 134 So. 457 (Rutland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rutland v. State, 134 So. 457, 24 Ala. App. 276, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 276 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).
Opinion
It does not appear from the bill of exceptions that an exception was reserved to the action of the court in overruling defendant’s (appellant’s) motion for a new trial. Where this is the case, said action will not be here reviewed.
We discover no prejudicial error, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed..
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
134 So. 457, 24 Ala. App. 276, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rutland-v-state-alactapp-1931.