Rutland v. State

134 So. 457, 24 Ala. App. 276, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 276

Opinion

RICE, J.

It does not appear from the bill of exceptions that an exception was reserved to the action of the court in overruling defendant’s (appellant’s) motion for a new trial. Where this is the case, said action will not be here reviewed.

We discover no prejudicial error, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed..

Affirmed.