Rutherford v. . Village of Holley
11 N.E. 818, 105 N.Y. 632, 1887 N.Y. LEXIS 788
Opinion
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 634
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 635
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 636 ANDREWS, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rutherford v. . Village of Holley, 11 N.E. 818, 105 N.Y. 632, 1887 N.Y. LEXIS 788 (N.Y. 1887).
11 N.E. 818 (Rutherford v. . Village of Holley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Finley v. City of Kendallville
90 N.E. 1036 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1910)
Adams v. Oklahoma City
1908 OK 39 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1908)
Baldwin v. Ohio Township
67 L.R.A. 642 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1904)