Russo v. Deer Run Property Owner' Association, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Florida
DecidedMarch 4, 2022
Docket5:20-cv-00619
StatusUnknown

This text of Russo v. Deer Run Property Owner' Association, Inc. (Russo v. Deer Run Property Owner' Association, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Russo v. Deer Run Property Owner' Association, Inc., (M.D. Fla. 2022).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION

In re: Lilia Belkova Russo,

Debtor. Bankr. No. 3:20-bk-2204-RCT ______________________________________

LILIA BELKOVA RUSSO,

Appellant, v. Case No. 5:20-cv-619-TJC

DEER RUN PROPERTY OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, INC., PNC BANK, N.A., and FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP,

Appellees. ____________________________________

Appellant, v. Case No. 5:21-cv-25-TJC

PNC BANK, N.A.,

Appellee. ____________________________________

ORDER These consolidated bankruptcy appeals are before the Court following the timely appeals by appellant Lilia Belkova Russo of the United States Bankruptcy Court’s November 19, 2020 order which dismissed Russo’s Chapter 12 bankruptcy case and imposed a one year bar against future filings (Doc. 1- 31), the November 23, 2020 order granting Deer Run Property Owners’

Association, Inc. (“Deer Run”) prospective in rem relief from the automatic stay (Doc. 1-2), and the December 21, 2020 order granting PNC Bank, N.A. (“PNC”) prospective in rem relief from the automatic stay (Doc. 1-2 in Case No. 5:21-cv- 25). The parties filed consolidated briefs in support of their respective

positions. See Docs. 41, 51. Though permitted to do so, appellant did not file a reply. Deer Run has also filed an amended motion to dismiss the appeal as moot (Doc. 48) (and supplement thereto (Doc. 54)), and appellees filed a consolidated motion for sanctions against Russo and her counsel (Doc. 52).

Appellant did not respond to either of these motions. Russo’s counsel also filed an emergency motion to withdraw (Doc. 53), which the Court determined to carry with the case until it decided the sanctions motion. Before taking up the merits of the appeals, the Court considers Deer

Run’s amended motion to dismiss the appeals as moot as to Deer Run (Doc. 48). As permitted by the Bankruptcy Court’s November 19, 2020 order dismissing Russo’s Chapter 12 bankruptcy case and its November 23, 2020 order granting Deer Run prospective relief from the automatic stay to pursue its in rem

remedies (which orders Russo did not seek to stay), Deer Run resumed its state

1 Unless otherwise stated, all filings are in Case No. 5:20-cv-619. court foreclosure action against Russo’s real property located at 2251 Buck Ridge Trail, Loxahatchee, Florida 33470. Following a judicial foreclosure sale

on October 13, 2021, and after the state court overruled Russo’s objection to the sale and rejected subsequent efforts by Russo and her mother to stay issuance of the certificate of title pending appeal, the Clerk of the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County, Florida, recorded a certificate of title on January 10, 2022,

transferring ownership of the property to the highest bidder. See Doc. 54, Exhibits A, B, C. With the 2251 Buck Ridge Trail property no longer in the bankruptcy estate, there is no relief this Court could provide that would affect Deer Run.

The appeals are therefore dismissed as moot as to Deer Run. See Lashley v. First Nat’l Bank of Live Oaks (In re Lashley), 825 F.2d 362, 364 (11th Cir. 1987) (holding that “[w]hen a debtor does not obtain a stay pending appeal of a bankruptcy court or district court order setting aside an automatic stay and

allowing a creditor to foreclose on property, the subsequent foreclosure renders moot any appeal”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1075, reh’g denied, 485 U.S. 1016 (1988). Turning to the appeals as to PNC and Fidelity National Title Group

(“Fidelity”),2 the Court is sitting in an appellate capacity. It therefore reviews

2 Although the order dismissing Russo’s Chapter 12 case was on Deer Run’s motion, PNC and Fidelity had joined the motion. See Doc. 1-3 at ¶ 1. the bankruptcy court’s legal conclusions de novo and its factual findings for clear error. See, e.g., In re Yerian, 927 F.3d 122, 127 (11th Cir. 2019) (citation

and quotation omitted). In her brief, Russo raises three issues: (1) whether the Bankruptcy Court erred in granting the motions for prospective relief from the stay; (2) whether the Bankruptcy Court erred in dismissing Russo’s Chapter 12 case and

doing so with prejudice to further filing for one year; and (3) whether the Bankruptcy Court erred by dismissing the Chapter 12 case without an evidentiary hearing. Before issuing her rulings, the Bankruptcy Judge reviewed the parties’

briefs and took judicial notice of the contents of Russo’s three previous bankruptcy cases since 2011, the related appeals, and the related state court proceedings. The Bankruptcy Judge held a lengthy hearing (see transcript, Doc. 42, Ex. A) at which Russo (appearing pro se) was permitted to make all of

her arguments and speak as long as she wanted. Russo discussed the evidence she might put forward if permitted (testimony from one of her former lawyers), but the Bankruptcy Judge explained why that evidence would not be relevant to the issues before the Court. The Bankruptcy Judge explained to Russo that

many of her arguments should be raised with the state court, were related to her other bankruptcy cases, or were already on appeal.3 The Bankruptcy Judge discussed on the record the evidence before her and the applicable law

before making her rulings, which were then incorporated into brief written orders. Following entry of the dismissal order and the order granting Deer Run’s motion for prospective relief from stay, the Bankruptcy Judge held a further hearing on PNC’s motion for prospective relief from stay. Russo did

not appear at the hearing at the scheduled time, but the Bankruptcy Judge considered Russo’s supplemental filings before ruling on the record in PNC’s favor, reincorporating her earlier rulings.4 Upon careful consideration of the briefs and records on appeal, the Court

concludes the bankruptcy court committed no errors of law and made no clearly erroneous factual findings. The Bankruptcy Judge’s orders are affirmed. As to the appellees’ consolidated motion for sanctions against Russo and her counsel (Doc. 52) (to which neither responded), the Court has determined to

3 At the time, Russo had appealed the Bankruptcy Judge’s summary judgment order finding PNC retained enforceable lien rights as to the same Buck Ridge Trail property. See Case No. 5:20-cv-143-BJD. 4About thirty minutes after the hearing concluded, Russo appeared (without counsel for PNC present), seeking to be heard. The Bankruptcy Judge explained to Russo that she had already ruled, and that Russo could seek rehearing, which she later did, but only after she had already filed a notice of appeal. When the Bankruptcy Judge denied Russo’s motion for reconsideration (finding the court had no jurisdiction in light of the appeals), Russo appealed that order too, resulting in Case No. 5:21-cv-633, a separate appeal now also pending before the undersigned. deny the motion. Because the Court will not be awarding sanctions, Russo’s counsel’s emergency motion to withdraw (Doc. 53) (which represents that Russo

refused to consent to counsel’s withdrawal) is granted. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. Appellee Deer Run Property Owners’ Association, Inc.’s Amended

Motion to Dismiss Appeal as Moot (Doc. 48) is GRANTED. This appeal is dismissed as moot as to appellee Deer Run Property Owners’ Association, Inc., which resolves the Bankruptcy Court’s November 19, 2020 order dismissing Russo’s Chapter 12 bankruptcy case as applied to Deer Run, and resolves its

November 23, 2020 order granting Deer Run’s motion for prospective relief from the automatic stay. 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Russo v. Deer Run Property Owner' Association, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russo-v-deer-run-property-owner-association-inc-flmd-2022.