Russell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Russell v. State

557 S.W.3d 523

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 11, 2018·No. No. ED 106085·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

T.J. Russell ("Movant") appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Movant's sole point on appeal is his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to raise an alibi defense and call his mother to testify in support at his trial. Finding no clear error, we affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

T.J. Russell ("Movant") appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Movant's sole point on appeal is his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to raise an alibi defense and call his mother to testify in support at his trial. Finding no clear error, we affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16.

Russell v. State, 557 S.W.3d 523 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

557 S.W.3d 523 (Russell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related