Russell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Russell v. State

482 S.W.3d 882, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 228, 2016 WL 1085688

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 15, 2016

DocketNo. ED 102934

StatusPublished

This text of 482 S.W.3d 882 (Russell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Russell v. State, 482 S.W.3d 882, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 228, 2016 WL 1085688 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Devion Russell (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Movant claims the motion court erred by denying his post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing because he pleaded facts unrefuted by the record that his plea counsel was ineffective for pressuring him to plead guilty. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Devion Russell (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Movant claims the motion court erred by denying his post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing because he pleaded facts unrefuted by the record that his plea counsel was ineffective for pressuring him to plead guilty. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

482 S.W.3d 882, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 228, 2016 WL 1085688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-state-moctapp-2016.