Russell v. State

375 S.W.3d 914, 2012 WL 3793089, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1089
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Russell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 189
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 4, 2012·No. No. WD 74013·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Jeremy S. Russell appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Missouri, denying, after an evi-dentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 amended motion for post-conviction relief based on' ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Upon review of the record, we find no error and affirm in this per curiam order. We have provided the parties with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell v. State, 375 S.W.3d 914, 2012 WL 3793089, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1089 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

375 S.W.3d 914 (Russell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.