Russell v. State

357 S.W.3d 316, 2012 WL 265919, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 124
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 31, 2012
DocketWD 73179
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 357 S.W.3d 316 (Russell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Russell v. State, 357 S.W.3d 316, 2012 WL 265919, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 124 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Kimoni Russell appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, after an evidentiary hearing. He raises a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Calfee
357 S.W.3d 316 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
357 S.W.3d 316, 2012 WL 265919, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-state-moctapp-2012.