Russell v. State

199 S.W.3d 899, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1268, 2006 WL 2472893
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Russell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 367
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 29, 2006·No. No. ED 86786·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Melvin L. Russell (“Movant”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant was found guilty, following a jury trial, of possession of a controlled substance, section 195.202, RSMo 2000. Movant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to a term of fifteen years of imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment of the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell v. State, 199 S.W.3d 899, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1268, 2006 WL 2472893 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

199 S.W.3d 899 (Russell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.