Russell v. State

157 S.W.3d 384, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 367, 2005 WL 525253
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 8, 2005·No. ED 84335·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Stacy L. Russell, appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying Mov-ant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell v. State, 157 S.W.3d 384, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 367, 2005 WL 525253 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

157 S.W.3d 384 (Russell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meyer v. State
157 S.W.3d 384 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)