Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Russell v. State

Russell v. State

157 S.W.3d 384, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 367, 2005 WL 525253
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 8, 2005
DocketED 84335
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 157 S.W.3d 384 (Russell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Russell v. State, 157 S.W.3d 384, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 367, 2005 WL 525253 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Stacy L. Russell, appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying Mov-ant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meyer v. State
157 S.W.3d 384 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 S.W.3d 384, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 367, 2005 WL 525253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-state-moctapp-2005.