Meyer v. State

157 S.W.3d 384, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 361, 2005 WL 525254
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 8, 2005·No. ED 84269·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Ricky Lee Meyer, appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meyer v. State, 157 S.W.3d 384, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 361, 2005 WL 525254 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

157 S.W.3d 384 (Meyer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Russell v. State
157 S.W.3d 384 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)