Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Russell v. State

Russell v. State

169 S.E.2d 124, 225 Ga. 371, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 501
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 16, 1969·No. 25203·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

Undbrcoflhr, Justice.

Enumerations of error are required to be filed separately from the brief. Code- Ann. § 6-810 (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 29, as amended by Ga. L. 1965, pp. 240, 243, and 1968, pp. 1072, 1077). Incorporation of the enumerations of error in the brief fails to comply with this rule and presents nothing for review by this court. Windsor v. Southeastern Adjusters, Inc., 221 Ga. 329 (144 SE2d 739); Cagle v. P. M. C. Development Co., 224 Ga. 515 (162 SE2d 723).

[372]*372Submitted May 13, 1969 Decided June 16, 1969. WilliamS. Cain, for appellant. W. B. Skipworth, District Attorney, Frank K. Martin, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, Marion 0. Gordon, Assistant Attorney General, Larry H. Evans, for appellee.

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Mobley and Grice, JJ., who dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell v. State, 169 S.E.2d 124, 225 Ga. 371, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 501 (Ga. 1969).

169 S.E.2d 124 (Russell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leslie v. Williams
510 S.E.2d 130 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)
Moss v. Rutzke
476 S.E.2d 770 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
Wordu v. State
455 S.E.2d 101 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1995)
Ehlers v. Schwall & Heuett
340 S.E.2d 207 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Russell v. State
169 S.E.2d 124 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1969)