Russell v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Russell v. State

169 S.E.2d 124, 225 Ga. 371, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 501

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 16, 1969

Docket25203

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 169 S.E.2d 124 (Russell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Russell v. State, 169 S.E.2d 124, 225 Ga. 371, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 501 (Ga. 1969).

Pincite

Opinions

Undbrcoflhr, Justice.

Enumerations of error are required to be filed separately from the brief. Code- Ann. § 6-810 (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 29, as amended by Ga. L. 1965, pp. 240, 243, and 1968, pp. 1072, 1077). Incorporation of the enumerations of error in the brief fails to comply with this rule and presents nothing for review by this court. Windsor v. Southeastern Adjusters, Inc., 221 Ga. 329 (144 SE2d 739); Cagle v. P. M. C. Development Co., 224 Ga. 515 (162 SE2d 723).

[372]*372Submitted May 13, 1969 Decided June 16, 1969. WilliamS. Cain, for appellant. W. B. Skipworth, District Attorney, Frank K. Martin, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, Marion 0. Gordon, Assistant Attorney General, Larry H. Evans, for appellee.

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Mobley and Grice, JJ., who dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI