Russell v. State

6 So. 3d 114, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3204, 2009 WL 996843
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Russell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 957 So. 2d 716
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 15, 2009·No. 2D07-2970·Published

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Chief Judge.

We affirm without comment Jeffrey Russell’s convictions following his no contest plea to several sexual offenses involving minors. But as properly conceded by the State, the probation imposed for counts three and four was not orally pronounced by the court at sentencing. Accordingly, we reverse and remand solely for the purpose of striking the probation on those two counts. See Ashley v. State, 850 So.2d 1265, 1268 (Fla.2003) (holding that court’s oral pronouncement of sentence controls over discrepancy in written sentence).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

FULMER and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell v. State, 6 So. 3d 114, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3204, 2009 WL 996843 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

6 So. 3d 114 (Russell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ashley v. State
850 So. 2d 1265 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)