Russell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Russell v. State

949 So. 2d 1211, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3422, 2007 WL 700978

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 9, 2007

DocketNo. 5D06-1345

StatusPublished

This text of 949 So. 2d 1211 (Russell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Russell v. State, 949 So. 2d 1211, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3422, 2007 WL 700978 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Russell appeals from a restitution order. We find no abuse of discretion in the court’s decision to order $10,000 as restitution to replace stolen aluminum screened enclosures. Bernard v. State, 859 So.2d 560, 562 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

However, as the state properly concedes, the trial court erred in awarding $2,928.60 as restitution for stolen copper tubing and accompanying damage to air conditioning equipment. These alleged losses were not encompassed within the charges filed against Russell. Noland v. State, 734 So.2d 464 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED with instructions to reduce appellant’s restitution obligation to $10,000.

PLEUS, C.J. and SAWAYA and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI