Russell v. State
351 So. 2d 398, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16790
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Russell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 373 So. 2d 97 →
Opinion
We affirm the order of the trial court revoking appellant’s probation, but we remand this case for resentencing of appellant. The present sentence does not specifically set forth the period of credit time appellant is to receive as Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975) requires. Smith v. State, 310 So.2d 770 (Fla.2d DCA 1975). Appellant need not be present at resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Russell v. State, 351 So. 2d 398, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16790 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).
351 So. 2d 398 (Russell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. State
310 So. 2d 770 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)