Russell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Russell v. State

355 So. 2d 441

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 10, 1978·No. No. 77-468·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court. However, the present sentence does not specify the amount of credit for time served as Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975) requires. Brooks v. State, 349 So.2d 794 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Therefore, we remand the case for correction of sentence, and appellant need not be present at that time.

BOARDMAN, C. J., and GRIMES and OTT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court. However, the present sentence does not specify the amount of credit for time served as Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975) requires. Brooks v. State, 349 So.2d 794 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Therefore, we remand the case for correction of sentence, and appellant need not be present at that time.

BOARDMAN, C. J., and GRIMES and OTT, JJ., concur.

Russell v. State, 355 So. 2d 441 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

355 So. 2d 441 (Russell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related