Russell v. Florida Ranch Lands, Inc.

414 So. 2d 1178, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20265
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 9, 1982
Docket82-12
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 414 So. 2d 1178 (Russell v. Florida Ranch Lands, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Russell v. Florida Ranch Lands, Inc., 414 So. 2d 1178, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20265 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

414 So.2d 1178 (1982)

Robert B. RUSSELL and Russell Florida Lands, Inc., Appellants,
v.
FLORIDA RANCH LANDS, INC., Appellee.

No. 82-12.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 9, 1982.

*1179 Gordon H. Harris and Herbert M. Hill, of Gray, Harris & Robinson, P.A., Orlando, for appellants.

Edmund T. Woolfolk and Cameron H. Linton, of Woolfolk, Estes & Palmour, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.

SHARP, Judge.

Robert Russell and Russell Florida Lands, Inc., appeal the lower court's non-final order granting appellee's motion for a temporary injunction. The essential elements which must be proved before a preliminary injunction can be issued are a legal right in the subject matter of the suit, likelihood of irreparable harm because of the unavailability of an adequate remedy at law and a substantial likelihood of success on the merits. Oxford International Bank and Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 374 So.2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Since none of these elements were established by the testimony or record in this case, there was no foundation upon which to ground a preliminary injunction. Accordingly, it is

REVERSED.

COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jacksonville v. NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADV.
634 So. 2d 750 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Pacanins v. Pacanins
613 So. 2d 481 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
C.R. v. E.
573 So. 2d 1088 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Cr v. E. ____
573 So. 2d 1088 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Salamon v. Karan Munuswamy, M.D., P.A.
566 So. 2d 899 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Hall v. City of Orlando
555 So. 2d 963 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Langford v. Rotech Oxygen & Med. Equip., Inc.
541 So. 2d 1267 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
MID-FLORIDA AT EUSTIS v. Griffin
521 So. 2d 357 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Supal v. Pelot
469 So. 2d 949 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Torok v. BLUE SKIES MOBILE HOME OA
467 So. 2d 474 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Schwadel v. Uchitel
455 So. 2d 401 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Heavener, Ogier Services, Inc. v. RW Fla. Region
418 So. 2d 1074 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
414 So. 2d 1178, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-florida-ranch-lands-inc-fladistctapp-1982.