Pacanins v. Pacanins

613 So. 2d 481, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13641, 1992 WL 385483
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 29, 1992·No. No. 92-1915·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order granting a temporary injunction because appel-lee has failed to show a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, and the likelihood of irreparable harm because of unavailability of an adequate remedy at law. See Russell v. Florida Ranch Lands, Inc., 414 So.2d 1178 (Fla. 5th DCA1982); Oxford International Bank and Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 374 So.2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. dismissed, 383 So.2d 1199 (Fla.1980).

Reversed and remanded with instructions to dissolve the temporary injunction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pacanins v. Pacanins, 613 So. 2d 481, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13641, 1992 WL 385483 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

613 So. 2d 481 (Pacanins v. Pacanins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pacanins v. Pacanins
650 So. 2d 1028 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)