Pacanins v. Pacanins

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pacanins v. Pacanins

613 So. 2d 481, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13641, 1992 WL 385483

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 29, 1992

DocketNo. 92-1915

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 613 So. 2d 481 (Pacanins v. Pacanins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pacanins v. Pacanins, 613 So. 2d 481, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13641, 1992 WL 385483 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order granting a temporary injunction because appel-lee has failed to show a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, and the likelihood of irreparable harm because of unavailability of an adequate remedy at law. See Russell v. Florida Ranch Lands, Inc., 414 So.2d 1178 (Fla. 5th DCA1982); Oxford International Bank and Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 374 So.2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. dismissed, 383 So.2d 1199 (Fla.1980).

Reversed and remanded with instructions to dissolve the temporary injunction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order granting a temporary injunction because appel-lee has failed to show a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, and the likelihood of irreparable harm because of unavailability of an adequate remedy at law. See Russell v. Florida Ranch Lands, Inc., 414 So.2d 1178 (Fla. 5th DCA1982); Oxford International Bank and Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 374 So.2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. dismissed, 383 So.2d 1199 (Fla.1980).

Reversed and remanded with instructions to dissolve the temporary injunction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

613 So. 2d 481, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13641, 1992 WL 385483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pacanins-v-pacanins-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack