Russell v. Bristol

50 Conn. 221
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJune 15, 1882
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 50 Conn. 221 (Russell v. Bristol) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Russell v. Bristol, 50 Conn. 221 (Colo. 1882).

Opinion

Pardee, J.

The legislature incorporated the American Mutual Life Insurance Company in 1847, with power to insure lives. The charter and the amendments thereto provided that its trustees might at their discretion at any time establish, and from time to time re-establish, the whole or any part of a guarantee capital, not to exceed the sum of $100,000 at any one time, and might require the same to be paid in cash, notes, or approved securities; the same to be used, assessed or negotiated if necessary for the payment of its debts; if not used, to be refunded with interest; if used, to be refunded with interest from its first surplus receipts.

In 1872 the insurance commissioner declared the company to be insolvent to the extent of $48,678, and forbade it to issue policies unless the deficiency should be made good.

Availing themselves of the provisions of the charter, its trustees on March 17th, 1873, resolved to establish a guarantee fund to the extent of $75,000, for the purpose of supplying this deficiency, and thereby obtaining permission to continue business.

On that day Willis Bristol was a shareholder in the company and one of its trustees; was its treasurer, knew of its insolvency, participated in the vote to establish the guarantee capital, and had knowledge of the purpose for which it was established. To this capital he subscribed the sum of ten thousand dollars, signing with others the following form of subscription:—

“ Whereas, the board of trustees of the American Mutual Life Insurance Company have resolved to establish a [223]*223guarantee capital amounting to seventy-five thousand dollars, under the provisions of the charter of said company and the amendments thereto, and to pay for the use of the same as follows: three per cent, each on the first day of July and the first day of January in each year, for the term .of three years:—And whereas it is agreed that said guarantee capital shall not be used or resorted to unless all the resources of said company are exhausted, and' that whatever income is derived from the bonds, stocks or mortgages, or other securities transferred to said company as a part of said capital, shall be, when collected by the treasurer of said company, paid to the owners thereof, and the securities be surrendered at the termination of said three years from the 15th day of December, 1872:—Now therefore, we, the undersigned, do hereby subscribe for such amount of said guarantee capital as we respectively set opposite to our names, subject to the terms of said charter and this agreement, and hereby agree to transfer to said company such securities, to the amount of our respective subscriptions, as shall be approved by the board of trustees. And further, we hereby consent that said American Mutual Life Insurance Company may transfer our said securities to the American National Life & Trust Company, whenever said company shall assume the liabilities of the American Mutual Life Insurance Company, as provided in certain special acts of the legislature heretofore passed. Our liability under this subscription shall commence on and terminate three years from said date.”

Mr. Bristol transferred to the company two hundred shares of the stock of the Morris & Essex Railroad Company, nearly of the value of $10,000, and took from himself as treasurer an acknowledgment in accordance with the following form, which had been adopted by a vote of the directors :—

“Received, March 1873, from Mr. in payment of his subscription of dollars towards a guarantee capital of seventy-five thousand dollars for the American Mutual Life Ihsur&ncé Company, (of which said [224]*224subscription the above is a true copy,) the following securities, to be used as a part of said guarantee capital, according to the tenor of said subscription, and for no other purpose; and all obligation on the part of the subscriber herein named shall cease at the expiration of three years from the 15th day of December, 1872.”

On April 15th, 1878, the American Mutual Life Insurance Company transferred substantially all its assets and securities to the American National Life & Trust Company, a corporation chartered by the legislature of this state.

During his life Mr. Bristol received from the corporation the dividends declared upon the shares, and annual interest at the rate of six per cent, upon the sum of $10,000. He died May 8th, 1875. The defendants, his executors, received from the corporation the dividends and interest subsequently accruing. On December 24th, 1875, the treasurer of the American National Life & Trust Company delivered to L. S. Hotchkiss, one of the defendants, as executor, the certificate for the shares which Mr. Bristol had delivered to the company, with a power of attorney for the transfer; and in June, 1876, these were distributed under an order of the probate court to legatees of Mr. Bristol as a part of his estate.

In 1878 it was judicially determined, upon a proper proceeding for that purpose, that the American Mutual Life Insurance Company and the American National Life & Trust Company were insolvent; the plaintiff was appointed receiver for both; having duly qualified he made a demand in February, 1879, upon the defendants substantially in the following words:—'

“ Messrs. Leonard S. Hotchkiss and Willis Bristol, executors of the estate of Willis Bristol, deceased:—Gentlemen— Please take notice that I have been appointed by the Superior Court receiver of the American National Life & Trust Company of New Haven, and that as such receiver I am authorized to call in and collect all unpaid subscriptions or instalments thereof due on account of any capital heretofore subscribed for the use of said company, and all [225]*225subscriptions and securities made or pledged for said capital and thereafter Improperly refunded or cancelled by said company, or otherwise remaining unpaid, and bring any necessary suits therefor? and that, In pursuance of the power so vested in me by said court, I hereby call in and demand of the estate of Willis Bristol, deceased, and of you and each of you as executors of said estate, payment of the full amount of subscription of said Bristol to the guarantee capital or fund originally subscribed to the American Mutual Life Insurance Company and afterwards claimed by the American National Life & Trust Company, amounting to ten thousand dollars In all, to be paid 'to me as such receiver on or before the first day of April, A. d., 1879. I also, as such receiver, demand of you and each of you, as executors of said estate, the immediate return of all securities deposited in connection with such subscription, to wit: two hundred shares of Morris & Essex Railroad stock, and of all other securities left in connection therewith. Said company became insolvent prior to October, 1875, and has since continued so, and said securities and said guarantee capital were thereupon required and are required to meet claims against said company. I enclose herewith, in order to prevent any possible question as to the proper party to make this call upon you, a similar call and demand made in my capacity as receiver of the American Mutual Life Insurance Company. A compliance with this call, or that by me in my capacity as receiver of the American Mutual Life Insurance Company, will be deeméd by me a sufficient excuse for non-compliance with the other. I hereby present the said demand as a claim against said estate.” (Signed by Mr. Russell as receiver of the American National Life &

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oneto v. Town of Hamden
169 F. Supp. 2d 72 (D. Connecticut, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 Conn. 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-bristol-conn-1882.