Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/RUSSELL G. DEPASQUALE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

RUSSELL G. DEPASQUALE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in RUSSELL G. DEPASQUALE v. STATE OF FLORIDA. Read the opinion of the Court — 257 So. 3d 505 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 17, 2018·No. 16-1958·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

RUSSELL G. DEPASQUALE, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D16-1958

[May 17, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Raag Singhal, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 06-16972CF10A, 06-20348CF10A, 07-11032CF10A.

Russell G. Depasquale, Raiford, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mitchell A. Egber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RUSSELL G. DEPASQUALE v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

RUSSELL G. DEPASQUALE v. STATE OF FLORIDA (RUSSELL G. DEPASQUALE v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.