RUSSELL G. DEPASQUALE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of RUSSELL G. DEPASQUALE v. STATE OF FLORIDA (RUSSELL G. DEPASQUALE v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
RUSSELL G. DEPASQUALE, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D16-1958
[May 17, 2018]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Raag Singhal, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 06-16972CF10A, 06-20348CF10A, 07-11032CF10A.
Russell G. Depasquale, Raiford, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mitchell A. Egber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
RUSSELL G. DEPASQUALE v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-g-depasquale-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2018.