Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Rusolo v. Skate Odyssey

Rusolo v. Skate Odyssey

109 A.D.2d 875, 487 N.Y.S.2d 67, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47395
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 25, 1985
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 109 A.D.2d 875 (Rusolo v. Skate Odyssey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rusolo v. Skate Odyssey, 109 A.D.2d 875, 487 N.Y.S.2d 67, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47395 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., Killarney, Fabiani & Brody, defendant’s law firm, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pizzuto, J.), dated December 3, 1984, which denied its application for leave to withdraw as counsel for the defendant in the above-entitled matter.

Order affirmed, with costs.

A motion to withdraw as counsel is an inappropriate means of testing the propriety of an insurance carrier’s disclaimer of liability on the ground of lack of cooperation by the insured (see, Brothers v Burt, 27 NY2d 905; Presley v Williams, 57 AD2d 947; Monaghan v Meade, 91 AD2d 1014). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seye v. Sibbio
33 A.D.3d 608 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. ELRAC, Inc.
192 Misc. 2d 78 (New York Supreme Court, 2002)
Pryer v. DeMatteis Organizations, Inc.
259 A.D.2d 476 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 A.D.2d 875, 487 N.Y.S.2d 67, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rusolo-v-skate-odyssey-nyappdiv-1985.