Rusolo v. Skate Odyssey

109 A.D.2d 875, 487 N.Y.S.2d 67, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47395
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 25, 1985·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., Killarney, Fabiani & Brody, defendant’s law firm, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pizzuto, J.), dated December 3, 1984, which denied its application for leave to withdraw as counsel for the defendant in the above-entitled matter.

Order affirmed, with costs.

A motion to withdraw as counsel is an inappropriate means of testing the propriety of an insurance carrier’s disclaimer of liability on the ground of lack of cooperation by the insured (see, Brothers v Burt, 27 NY2d 905; Presley v Williams, 57 AD2d 947; Monaghan v Meade, 91 AD2d 1014). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rusolo v. Skate Odyssey, 109 A.D.2d 875, 487 N.Y.S.2d 67, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47395 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

109 A.D.2d 875 (Rusolo v. Skate Odyssey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seye v. Sibbio
33 A.D.3d 608 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. ELRAC, Inc.
192 Misc. 2d 78 (New York Supreme Court, 2002)
Pryer v. DeMatteis Organizations, Inc.
259 A.D.2d 476 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)