Presley v. Williams

57 A.D.2d 947, 395 N.Y.S.2d 92, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12221
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 31, 1977·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 11, 1977, which denied appellant’s motion to withdraw as attorney for the defendant on the ground that the latter’s insurance company had disclaimed coverage. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to plaintiff payable by appellant. An attorney cannot use a motion to withdraw as a means of determining the validity of an insurance company’s disclaimer (Brothers v Burt, 27 NY2d 905). However, Special Term was premature in determining that the insurance company was estopped from disclaiming liability. The appropriate vehicle to resolve that issue is a declaratory judgment action. Martuscello, J. P., Cohalan, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Presley v. Williams, 57 A.D.2d 947, 395 N.Y.S.2d 92, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12221 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

57 A.D.2d 947 (Presley v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Laura Accessories, Inc. v. A.P.A. Warehouses, Inc.
140 A.D.2d 182 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Rusolo v. Skate Odyssey
109 A.D.2d 875 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Dennis v. Young
106 A.D.2d 762 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Monaghan v. Meade
91 A.D.2d 1014 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Globe Indemnity Co. v. Franklin Paving Co.
77 A.D.2d 581 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)