Rush v. Parker

9 U.S. 287, 3 L. Ed. 103, 5 Cranch 287, 1809 U.S. LEXIS 433
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 15, 1809·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

9 U.S. 287 (1809)
5 Cranch 287

RUSH
v.
PARKER

Supreme Court of United States.

March 15, 1809.

I.P. Boyd, for the defendant in error.

The court granted.

LIVINGSTON, J. thought that leave ought not to be given, on account of the delay it would produce. He had found a practice established here of receiving such affidavits; but he did not know of any case in which time had been given to produce them; and he would not consent to give it now. The case was *288 brought up to last term. The party ought to have come prepared to support the jurisdiction.

This being the last day of the term, and no affidavits having been produced,

The writ of error was dismissed, this court having no jurisdiction in the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rush v. Parker, 9 U.S. 287, 3 L. Ed. 103, 5 Cranch 287, 1809 U.S. LEXIS 433 (1809).

9 U.S. 287 (Rush v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.
306 U.S. 583 (Supreme Court, 1939)
Davie v. Heyward
33 F. 93 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina, 1887)
The Grace Girdler
73 U.S. 441 (Supreme Court, 1867)
Logan v. Patrick
9 U.S. 288 (Supreme Court, 1809)