Rupert National Bank v. Insurance Co. of North America
This text of 234 P. 465 (Rupert National Bank v. Insurance Co. of North America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The appeal from the judgment in this case was dismissed because it appeared from the record that the undertaking on appeal was not filed within the statutory time. Thereafter a petition for rehearing and for reinstatement of the appeal was filed, in which it was conceded that the filing of the undertaking within the time prescribed by the statute is a jurisdictional requirement, and suggested that the date of service of the notice of appeal, as incorrectly given in the transcript, misled the court. With the petition affidavits am submitted in which it is made to appear that the actual date of service of the notice of appeal was three days later than shown in the transcript, which would bring the filing of the undertaking on appeal within the statutory time. Opposing counsel has stipulated that the record may be corrected accordingly. The appeal has therefore been ordered reinstated, and the case is now for consideration on the merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 P. 465, 40 Idaho 530, 1925 Ida. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rupert-national-bank-v-insurance-co-of-north-america-idaho-1925.