Runkel v. Winemiller
4 H. & McH. 429
This text of 4 H. & McH. 429 (Runkel v. Winemiller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Runkel v. Winemiller, 4 H. & McH. 429 (Va. Super. Ct. 1799).
Opinion
The court ordered a peremptory mandamus. Yide the writ 2 Harr. Ent. 706.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Priester v. Baltimore County
157 A.3d 301 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2017)
Forster v. Hargadon
920 A.2d 1049 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2007)
State v. Manck
870 A.2d 196 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2005)
Wilson v. Simms
844 A.2d 412 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2004)
Doering v. Fader
558 A.2d 733 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1989)
In Re Petition for Writ of Prohibition
539 A.2d 664 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1988)
Fish v. Weatherwax
2 Johns. Cas. 215 (New York Supreme Court, 1801)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 H. & McH. 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/runkel-v-winemiller-vagensess-1799.