Rumsfeld v. Hamdi

337 F.3d 335, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 13719, 2003 WL 21540768
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 9, 2003·No. 02-7338·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinions

ORDER

Appellees filed a petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The panel voted to deny panel rehearing.

A member of the Court requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the judges in active service voted to deny rehearing en banc. Judges Luttig, Motz, King, and Gregory voted to grant rehearing en banc. Chief Judge Wilkins, and Judges Widener, Wilkinson, Niemeyer, Williams, Michael, Traxler, and Shedd voted to deny rehearing en banc.

Judge Wilkinson filed an opinion, concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc. Judge Traxler filed an opinion, concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc. Judge Luttig filed an opinion, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc. Judge Motz filed an opinion, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc.

[341] The Court denies the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered at the direction of Judge Wilkinson for the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rumsfeld v. Hamdi, 337 F.3d 335, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 13719, 2003 WL 21540768 (4th Cir. 2003).

337 F.3d 335 (Rumsfeld v. Hamdi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Corrales-Castro
412 P.3d 701 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2015)
Al-Marri v. Pucciarelli
534 F.3d 213 (Fourth Circuit, 2008)
Al-Marri v. Wright
487 F.3d 160 (Fourth Circuit, 2007)
Al-Marri v. Wright, Usn
487 F.3d 160 (First Circuit, 2007)
Padilla v. Hanft
389 F. Supp. 2d 678 (D. South Carolina, 2005)
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
542 U.S. 507 (Supreme Court, 2004)
Padilla v. Rumsfeld
352 F.3d 695 (Second Circuit, 2003)
Odom v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
349 F.3d 765 (Fourth Circuit, 2003)