Rumsey Indian Rancheria of Wintun Indians v. Wilson

E.D. California

Rumsey Indian Rancheria of Wintun Indians v. Wilson

112 F. Supp. 2d 1185, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15168, 2000 WL 1460029

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California

DecidedSeptember 12, 2000

DocketCIV. S-92-812 GEB

StatusPublished

This text of 112 F. Supp. 2d 1185 (Rumsey Indian Rancheria of Wintun Indians v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rumsey Indian Rancheria of Wintun Indians v. Wilson, 112 F. Supp. 2d 1185, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15168, 2000 WL 1460029 (E.D. Cal. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

BURRELL, District Judge.

The opinion filed September 16, 1998, and reported at 39 F.Supp.2d 1227 (E.D.Cal.1998), is withdrawn 1 and the judgment entered on the same date is vacated.

Further, because of the addition of subdivision (f) to Article IV, § 19 of the California Constitution and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, it is ordered that a new judgment be entered declaring that the State of California expressly permits the operation of slot machines, lottery games, and banking and percentage games by federally recognized Indian tribes on Indian lands in California, 2 when Compacts have been entered into in accordance with subdivision (f) and federal law. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

1

. I did not authorize the publication of the withdrawn opinion.

2

. The term "Indian lands” is defined in the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. § 2703.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

BURRELL, District Judge.

The opinion filed September 16, 1998, and reported at 39 F.Supp.2d 1227 (E.D.Cal.1998), is withdrawn 1 and the judgment entered on the same date is vacated.

Further, because of the addition of subdivision (f) to Article IV, § 19 of the California Constitution and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, it is ordered that a new judgment be entered declaring that the State of California expressly permits the operation of slot machines, lottery games, and banking and percentage games by federally recognized Indian tribes on Indian lands in California, 2 when Compacts have been entered into in accordance with subdivision (f) and federal law. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

1

. I did not authorize the publication of the withdrawn opinion.

2

. The term "Indian lands” is defined in the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. § 2703.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 F. Supp. 2d 1185, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15168, 2000 WL 1460029, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rumsey-indian-rancheria-of-wintun-indians-v-wilson-caed-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack