Rumsey Indian Rancheria of Wintun Indians v. Wilson

112 F. Supp. 2d 1185, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15168, 2000 WL 1460029
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rumsey Indian Rancheria of Wintun Indians v. Wilson. Read the opinion of the Court — 39 F. Supp. 2d 1227
District Court, E.D. California·Decided September 12, 2000·No. CIV. S-92-812 GEB·Published

Opinion

ORDER

BURRELL, District Judge.

The opinion filed September 16, 1998, and reported at 39 F.Supp.2d 1227 (E.D.Cal.1998), is withdrawn 1 and the judgment entered on the same date is vacated.

Further, because of the addition of subdivision (f) to Article IV, § 19 of the California Constitution and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, it is ordered that a new judgment be entered declaring that the State of California expressly permits the operation of slot machines, lottery games, and banking and percentage games by federally recognized Indian tribes on Indian lands in California, 2 when Compacts have been entered into in accordance with subdivision (f) and federal law. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

1

. I did not authorize the publication of the withdrawn opinion.

2

. The term "Indian lands” is defined in the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. § 2703.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rumsey Indian Rancheria of Wintun Indians v. Wilson, 112 F. Supp. 2d 1185, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15168, 2000 WL 1460029 (E.D. Cal. 2000).

112 F. Supp. 2d 1185 (Rumsey Indian Rancheria of Wintun Indians v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rumsey Indian Rancheria of Wintun Indians v. Wilson
39 F. Supp. 2d 1227 (E.D. California, 1998)