RUMFIELD v. Henney
763 N.W.2d 913, 2009 WL 1107774
Opinion
Timothy RUMFIELD, Personal Representative of the Estate of Daniel Rumfield, Deceased, and Conservator/Co-Guardian of Jeffrey Rumfield, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,
v.
Matthew HENNEY and Brian Henney, Defendants, and
Kelly Fuels, Inc., d/b/a Woodland Express Mart, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 16, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
RUMFIELD v. Henney, 763 N.W.2d 913, 2009 WL 1107774 (Mich. 2009).
763 N.W.2d 913 (RUMFIELD v. Henney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. McCall
763 N.W.2d 913 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)