RUMFIELD v. Henney
741 N.W.2d 12, 480 Mich. 944
Opinion
Timothy RUMFIELD, Personal Representative of the Estate of Daniel Rumfield, Deceased, and Conservator/Co-Guardian of Jeffrey Rumfield, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Matthew HENNEY, Defendant/Cross-Defendant, and
Brian Henney, Defendant, and
Kelly Fuels, Inc., d/b/a Woodland Express Mart, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 26, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for peremptory reversal is DENIED.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
RUMFIELD v. Henney, 741 N.W.2d 12, 480 Mich. 944 (Mich. 2007).
741 N.W.2d 12 (RUMFIELD v. Henney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Snyder
741 N.W.2d 12 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)