Ruiz v. State

139 So. 3d 932, 2014 WL 2106264, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7641
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ruiz v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 523
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 21, 2014·No. No. 14-644·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order summarily denying the appellant’s motion for postconviction relief. The motion attempted to go behind a plea which the appellant entered in 1999. No valid exception to the time limitation of Florida Rule of Critninal Procedure 3.850(b) was alleged in the motion. The appellant’s claim of newly discovered evidence lacks merit.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruiz v. State, 139 So. 3d 932, 2014 WL 2106264, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7641 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

139 So. 3d 932 (Ruiz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.