Ruiz v. State

109 So. 3d 1183, 2013 WL 1165064, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4753
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 22, 2013·No. No. 2D12-1040·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

SILBERMAN, Chief Judge.

Gregorio Ruiz seeks review of his judgment and sentence for attempted sexual battery and sexual activity with a child by a person in familial or custodial authority which was entered pursuant to a negotiated plea. Although Ruiz filed a timely pro se motion to withdraw plea after sentencing pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 8.170(0, the motion is a nullity because it was filed while Ruiz was still represented by counsel and was devoid of allegations giving rise to an adversarial relationship with counsel. See Sheppard v. State, 17 So.3d 275, 286 (Fla.2009). Because Ruiz has not properly preserved any challenges to his plea, we affirm.

Affirmed.

KELLY and SLEET, JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruiz v. State, 109 So. 3d 1183, 2013 WL 1165064, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4753 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

109 So. 3d 1183 (Ruiz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gianni Passino v. State of Florida
174 So. 3d 1055 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)