Ruiz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ruiz v. State

139 So. 3d 932, 2014 WL 2106264, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7641

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 21, 2014

DocketNo. 14-644

StatusPublished

This text of 139 So. 3d 932 (Ruiz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ruiz v. State, 139 So. 3d 932, 2014 WL 2106264, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7641 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order summarily denying the appellant’s motion for postconviction relief. The motion attempted to go behind a plea which the appellant entered in 1999. No valid exception to the time limitation of Florida Rule of Critninal Procedure 3.850(b) was alleged in the motion. The appellant’s claim of newly discovered evidence lacks merit.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order summarily denying the appellant’s motion for postconviction relief. The motion attempted to go behind a plea which the appellant entered in 1999. No valid exception to the time limitation of Florida Rule of Critninal Procedure 3.850(b) was alleged in the motion. The appellant’s claim of newly discovered evidence lacks merit.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 So. 3d 932, 2014 WL 2106264, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruiz-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.