Ruiz v. Sachs
374 N.E.2d 397, 43 N.Y.2d 894, 403 N.Y.S.2d 500, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 1820
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: On the proof in this instance, there having been compliance with the requirements of section 6-140 of the Election Law as to content and substantial compliance with the requirements of that section as to form, the order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ruiz v. Sachs, 374 N.E.2d 397, 43 N.Y.2d 894, 403 N.Y.S.2d 500, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 1820 (N.Y. 1978).
374 N.E.2d 397 (Ruiz v. Sachs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sacher v. State of New York
211 A.D.3d 867 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Panio v. Sunderland
14 A.D.3d 627 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Helfer v. Amos
159 Misc. 2d 65 (New York Supreme Court, 1993)
Barrett v. Scaringe
112 A.D.2d 1095 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Staber v. Fidler
110 A.D.2d 38 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Rhodes v. Salerno
442 N.E.2d 443 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Rhodes v. Salerno
90 A.D.2d 587 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Hutson v. Bass
426 N.E.2d 749 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
Ryan v. Board of Elections
83 A.D.2d 824 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Alamo v. Black
410 N.E.2d 1228 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)