Rhodes v. Salerno

442 N.E.2d 443, 57 N.Y.2d 885, 456 N.Y.S.2d 45, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3765
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 15, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 442 N.E.2d 443 (Rhodes v. Salerno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rhodes v. Salerno, 442 N.E.2d 443, 57 N.Y.2d 885, 456 N.Y.S.2d 45, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3765 (N.Y. 1982).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of that court (90 AD2d 587).

We would only add that section 6-146 of the Election Law requires a candidate nominated by a political party other than of a party of which he is an enrolled member to accept or decline that nomination “in a certificate signed and acknowledged by him.” The statute further provides that failure to comply will render the nomination null and void. We have repeatedly said that statutory commands as to matters of content must be strictly complied with. (Matter of Ruiz v Sachs, 43 NY2d 894, 895; Matter of Hutson v Bass, 54 NY2d 772, 774; Matter of Frome v Board of Elections of Nassau County, 57 NY2d 741.) The courts enjoy no discretion to allow candidates to deviate from these legislative mandates.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maher v. New York State Board of Elections
120 A.D.3d 891 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Biamonte v. Savinetti
87 A.D.3d 950 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Dixon v. Clyne
87 A.D.3d 812 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Hockley v. Westchester County Board of Elections
66 A.D.3d 898 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Williams v. Westchester County Board of Elections
65 A.D.3d 653 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Justice v. Gamache
45 A.D.3d 508 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Carnahan v. Ward
44 A.D.3d 1249 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Breslin v. Conners
10 A.D.3d 471 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Flach v. DeBenedictus
265 A.D.2d 670 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Deborah S. v. Diorio
153 Misc. 2d 708 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1992)
Loughran v. Mahoney
155 A.D.2d 991 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Di Lucia v. New York State Board of Elections
122 A.D.2d 968 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Radimak v. Nassar
119 A.D.2d 978 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
442 N.E.2d 443, 57 N.Y.2d 885, 456 N.Y.S.2d 45, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhodes-v-salerno-ny-1982.