Ruggles v. White Metal Rolling & Stamping Corp.

86 A.D.2d 847, 447 N.Y.S.2d 450, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15470
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 25, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 86 A.D.2d 847 (Ruggles v. White Metal Rolling & Stamping Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ruggles v. White Metal Rolling & Stamping Corp., 86 A.D.2d 847, 447 N.Y.S.2d 450, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15470 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

Appeal from order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Williams, J.), entered October 1, 1980, is hereby dismissed, without costs, as superseded by the order of April 24, 1981. Order entered April 24, 1981 (Williams, J.), and order entered September 21,1981 (Wolin, J.) are modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, to require that Interrogatory No. 17 be answered and Interrogatory Nos. 33 through 35 be limited to all medium-duty, five-foot aluminum stepladders manufactured by White Metal Rolling and Stamping Corporation for the years 1969 through 1977, and otherwise affirmed. Defendant-appellant Sears, Roebuck and Company appeals from three orders of the Supreme Court, New York County, all relating to interrogatories served by plaintiffs on defendant Sears in connection with an action asserting that plaintiff sustained personal injuries on or about September 19, 1977 when a stepladder upon which he was standing buckled. The stepladder in question, a five-foot aluminum, medium-duty model bearing number 42145 was allegedly purchased at a Sears, Roebuck store and manufactured by defendant White Metal Rolling & Stamping Corporation. Appellant objects to the scope of the discovery, claiming that there is no language in the interrogatories limiting the information to the particular type of ladder involved in this case. We agree to the extent indicated. Concur — Ross, J. P., Carro, Silverman, Bloom and Milonas, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cramer v. Kuhns
192 A.D.2d 893 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Mendelowitz v. Xerox Corp.
169 A.D.2d 300 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Valet v. American Motors Inc.
105 A.D.2d 645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 A.D.2d 847, 447 N.Y.S.2d 450, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruggles-v-white-metal-rolling-stamping-corp-nyappdiv-1982.