Ruggles v. Bernstein
74 N.E. 366, 188 Mass. 232, 1905 Mass. LEXIS 1133
Opinion
The evidence excluded related to defences which could have been set up in the original action. No fraud or collusion being shown, the judgment rendered against the principal was conclusive evidence of the debt thereby ascertained, both against her and against the surety. Cutter v. Evans, 115 Mass. 27. Way v. Lewis, 115 Mass. 26, and cases there cited.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ruggles v. Bernstein, 74 N.E. 366, 188 Mass. 232, 1905 Mass. LEXIS 1133 (Mass. 1905).
74 N.E. 366 (Ruggles v. Bernstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller Brewing Co. v. Capitol Distributing Co.
77 P.2d 359 (Utah Supreme Court, 1938)
Giatas v. Demoulos
170 N.E. 921 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1930)
Treasurer of City of Boston v. Schapero
217 Mass. 71 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)