Cutter v. Evans
This text of 115 Mass. 27 (Cutter v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant, in the original action, might have pleaded in bar his bankruptcy and the proof of the plaintiffs’ claim against his estate; or might, at any time after the commencement of proceedings in bankruptcy, have applied to the court in which the action was pending for a stay of proceedings. U. S„ St. 1867, c. 176, § 21. Bennett v. Goldthwait, 109 Mass. 494. Bradford v. Rice, 102 Mass. 472. But not having done either, the judgment rendered against him was lawful and valid, and in the absence of fraud or collusion (of which the case affords no evidence) was conclusive both against him and against the surety on his bond to dissolve the attachment. Tracy v. Maloney, 105 Mass. 90. The injunction granted by the District Court of the United States, if it ever had any validity, was dissolved before the bringing of the present action. The result is that there must be Judgment for the plaintiffs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 Mass. 27, 1874 Mass. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cutter-v-evans-mass-1874.