Ruggles, S. v. Switzer, J.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 17, 2023·No. 19 MM 2023·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

SUSAN ANN RUGGLES, : No. 19 MM 2023 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : JOSHUA S. SWITZER, HENRY ROOTE, : MICHAEL MCNEAL, BRIAN J. TUPPER, : DAVID A. BARILLA, JOSEPH F. : SKLAROSKY JR., MICHAEL T. VOUGH, : : Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2023, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process and the “Writ of Quo Warranto/Mandamus” are DISMISSED. See

Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that hybrid representation

is improper).

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record and to

strike the names of the jurists from the caption.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruggles, S. v. Switzer, J., (Pa. 2023).

Ruggles, S. v. Switzer, J. (Ruggles, S. v. Switzer, J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)