Ruggles, S. v. Switzer, J.
This text of Ruggles, S. v. Switzer, J. (Ruggles, S. v. Switzer, J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
SUSAN ANN RUGGLES, : No. 19 MM 2023 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : JOSHUA S. SWITZER, HENRY ROOTE, : MICHAEL MCNEAL, BRIAN J. TUPPER, : DAVID A. BARILLA, JOSEPH F. : SKLAROSKY JR., MICHAEL T. VOUGH, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2023, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process and the “Writ of Quo Warranto/Mandamus” are DISMISSED. See
Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that hybrid representation
is improper).
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record and to
strike the names of the jurists from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ruggles, S. v. Switzer, J., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruggles-s-v-switzer-j-pa-2023.