Ruggles, S. v. Switzer, J.
This text of Ruggles, S. v. Switzer, J. (Ruggles, S. v. Switzer, J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
SUSAN ANN RUGGLES, : No. 108 MM 2023 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : JOSHUA S. SWITZER, HENRY ROOTE, : MICHAEL MCNEAL, BRIAN J. TUPPER, : DAVID A. BARILLA, JOSEPH F. : SKLAROSKY JR., MICHAEL T. VOUGH, : MICHAEL DALEY, BRIAN COLEMAN, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 4th day of January, 2024, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process is GRANTED, and the “Writ of Quo Warranto/Mandamus” is DENIED.
Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ruggles, S. v. Switzer, J., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruggles-s-v-switzer-j-pa-2024.